<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>My Humble Abode &#187; wordpress</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.myhumbleabode.com/tag/wordpress/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.myhumbleabode.com</link>
	<description>my little corner of the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 21:32:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why maintain my own WordPress install?</title>
		<link>http://www.myhumbleabode.com/post/5164</link>
		<comments>http://www.myhumbleabode.com/post/5164#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 00:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon Warren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[myhumbleabode]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plugins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myhumbleabode.com/?p=5164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some of you might be wondering why I bother maintaining my own install of WordPress &#8212; instead of just using wordpress.com.  Well&#8230; it ties into my last post a bit.  It gives me the freedom <a href='http://www.myhumbleabode.com/post/5164'>[...]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of you might be wondering why I bother maintaining my own install of WordPress &#8212; instead of just using <a href="http://www.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">wordpress.com</a>.  Well&#8230; it ties into my <a href="http://www.myhumbleabode.com/post/5160" target="_blank">last post</a> a bit.  It gives me the <em>freedom</em> to do whatever I want with my own blog.  If I want to use plugins to enhance (in my own humble opinion) my blog, I can.  If I want to tweak the underlying code (albeit, not something I&#8217;ve done in a while), I can.</p>
<p>Sure, letting the folks over at WordPress maintain the underlying code-base would be a nice thing.  Sure, it might make it easier for people to log in to leave comments or read &#8220;member only&#8221; material (both of which I used to have on this site*).  But it takes away freedom from me by their limitations they have imposed &#8212; particularly the lack of plugins bit.</p>
<p>Wasn&#8217;t the whole point of WordPress to <em>allow</em> third party developers to <em>extend</em> the base software?  (No, really, I&#8217;m asking.  I think it was, but I&#8217;m not sure.)  So&#8230; using a limited base install of the software (what used to be known as &#8220;cripple-ware&#8221; before the web became big) just isn&#8217;t for me.  If it is for you, more power to ya.</p>
<p>* I had originally intended to expand the number of posts in the &#8220;Member Only&#8221; area that I had on this site, but I&#8217;ve learned a couple of things.  One:  Very few people actually honestly care about what I have to say.  Two:  Those few people who do visit my site are of similar types as myself and don&#8217;t want to have to register on a bazillion different sites &#8212; <em>even if they know the person</em>.  Hell&#8230; I <em>hate</em> it when I have to register on some site just to download a Joomla component or plugin.  Wait.  I hated it when I had to register on <a href="http://www.wordpress.org/" target="_blank">wordpress.org</a> in order to report a bug on a plugin.  But I did.  Why?  It&#8217;s a fact of life.  Yet, I can understand when someone doesn&#8217;t want to register on here &#8212; after all, I don&#8217;t post all that much &#8212; so I&#8217;ve removed the &#8220;Member Access&#8221; plugin I was using and removed the (albeit unintentionally turned on) restriction to comments to only those registered users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.myhumbleabode.com/post/5164/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review: Allow Categories WordPress Plugin</title>
		<link>http://www.myhumbleabode.com/post/2561</link>
		<comments>http://www.myhumbleabode.com/post/2561#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 15:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon Warren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plugins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myhumbleabode.com/?p=2561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was using, was mind you, using the Allow Categories WordPress plugin to limit access to a few categories which I wanted to make &#8220;user only&#8221;.  For that purpose it worked great. The plugin gives <a href='http://www.myhumbleabode.com/post/2561'>[...]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was using, <em>was</em> mind you, using the <a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/allow-categories/" target="_blank">Allow Categories</a> WordPress plugin to limit access to a few categories which I wanted to make &#8220;user only&#8221;.  For that purpose it worked great.</p>
<p>The plugin gives a page, rather poorly laid out if you ask me, but a page nonetheless that allows you to select at the user and category level who has access to what categories.  Why &#8220;poorly&#8221;?  Imagine a grid with categories along the top, users down the side, and checkboxes at the intersections and you&#8217;ll have exactly how that page was laid out.  Now, this <em>isn&#8217;t</em> a bad thing if you don&#8217;t have that many categories, but do have lots of users.  But if you have lots of categories, then it&#8217;ll wind up with you scrolling horizontally &#8212; and <em>that</em> is <em>never</em> a good idea for a web page.</p>
<p>But, that&#8217;s just a design issue&#8230; and all of us web designers are different, and have different ideas of what is the &#8220;right&#8221; way to do something.</p>
<p>The reason that I&#8217;ve uninstalled this plugin (and temporarily moved all the posts I&#8217;m hiding to &#8220;draft&#8221; status until I can figure out a better solution) is that every time I added a new category, I&#8217;d forget that I had to go down to a different section of the admin interface and <em>enable</em> the <em>admin</em> user (me) to have access to that new category.  I&#8217;m sorry, but shouldn&#8217;t the admin have access to every category on the blog they&#8217;re administering?  Oh, and shouldn&#8217;t something that adds access permissions <em>to</em> a category enhance or extend the Categories page?  Or at the very least, stick it&#8217;s config page in the Posts section?  Hmmm?  Ya think?</p>
<p>So&#8230; I&#8217;m back to the drawing board, wondering why I had switched from Joomla &#8212; which actually <em>has</em> user access levels built-in &#8212; to WordPress.  Oh yeah&#8230; Joomla <em>sucks</em> as a blogging tool&#8230; but that&#8217;ll have to wait for another review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.myhumbleabode.com/post/2561/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Solved: Duplicate ‘views’ custom field w/ WP-PostViews</title>
		<link>http://www.myhumbleabode.com/post/2512</link>
		<comments>http://www.myhumbleabode.com/post/2512#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 23:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon Warren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plugins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myhumbleabode.com/?p=2512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was having a massive problem with duplicate custom fields all named &#8216;views&#8217; with a value of &#8217;1&#8242; on my blog.  By &#8220;massive&#8221; I mean over 1080 at the point I fixed the problem. The <a href='http://www.myhumbleabode.com/post/2512'>[...]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was having a massive problem with duplicate custom fields all named &#8216;views&#8217; with a value of &#8217;1&#8242; on my blog.  By &#8220;massive&#8221; I mean over 1080 at the point I fixed the problem.</p>
<p>The custom field &#8216;views&#8217; is used by the <a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wp-postviews/" target="_blank">WP-PostViews plugin</a> to keep track of how many times a post has been viewed.  This was desired, however unnecessary since Google Analytics is doing that nicely for me.  The undesired side-effect was that as the number of posts went up, the number of those duplicate fields would also increase.</p>
<p>These fields, mind you, were <em>not</em> stored in the database once I saved a post.  Nope.  They only existed when I created a new post.  The problem with having 1000+ of these, was that my browser would literally lock up while that the &#8220;New Post&#8221; page loaded.</p>
<p>Since I didn&#8217;t need that functionality inside my WordPress install, I disabled and completely deleted the plugin, but that didn&#8217;t fix the problem.</p>
<p>So I logged into my database (using phpMyAdmin or something similar) and after a quick bit of looking determined that the number of duplicate fields matched the number of &#8216;view&#8217; fields whose value was &#8217;1&#8242;.  Apparently the fields whose number was not &#8217;1&#8242; didn&#8217;t produce a duplicate on the new post page.</p>
<blockquote>
<pre>select count(*)
  from wp_postmeta
 where meta_key = 'views'
   and meta_value = '1'</pre>
</blockquote>
<p>Now, if I had intended to, at some point, revive that plugin on my blog; or if I wanted to keep the existing data; I wouldn&#8217;t do this next step exactly this way&#8230; I&#8217;d keep the &#8220;<code>and meta_value = '1'</code>&#8221; part of the previous query.  But since I didn&#8217;t, and since I&#8217;d already removed the plugin, I simply cleaned up the database.</p>
<blockquote>
<pre>delete
  from wp_postmeta
 where meta_key = 'views'</pre>
</blockquote>
<p>There.  No more duplicate fields on the New Post page.  It loads so much quicker now.  <img src='http://www.myhumbleabode.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.myhumbleabode.com/post/2512/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review: Simply Exclude plugin for WordPress</title>
		<link>http://www.myhumbleabode.com/post/1783</link>
		<comments>http://www.myhumbleabode.com/post/1783#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 08:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon Warren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plugins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myhumbleabode.com/?p=1783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had the WordPress plugin &#8220;Simply Exclude&#8221; installed both on here and on my JonWarrenPhotography.com site.  Until today I hadn&#8217;t really used it over on my photography site, since I only had the one category <a href='http://www.myhumbleabode.com/post/1783'>[...]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I <em>had</em> the WordPress plugin &#8220;Simply Exclude&#8221; installed both on here and on my JonWarrenPhotography.com site.  Until today I hadn&#8217;t really used it over on my photography site, since I only had the one category of posts there and therefore didn&#8217;t need to exclude anything.  However, I&#8217;ve recently started importing my Twitter feed there (like I&#8217;ve been doing here for a while) and wanted to exclude those posts from my main posts page (like I&#8217;ve been doing here successfully with Simply Exclude for a while).</p>
<p><span id="more-1783"></span></p>
<p>No such luck.</p>
<p>For some bloody reason which I&#8217;m baffled by, but don&#8217;t feel like investigating further (I figure 30+ minutes is enough time for someone else&#8217;s F-up), Simply Exclude is just not saving my changes.  I go into the same page (on JonWarrenPhotography.com) that I did on MyHumbleAbode.com, make the same changes, hit &#8220;save&#8221;, and whereas I get the note saying the changes have been saved, when I check the blog they&#8217;re not saved and if I go back to that same page, the changes haven&#8217;t been saved.  WTF.</p>
<p>Version check.  Yep, both sites are running on the same hosting platform (e.g., DB, OS), both sites are using the same version of WordPress, <em>and</em> both sites <em>had</em> the same version of the Simply Exclude plugin installed.  No dice.</p>
<p>Manual DB intervention didn&#8217;t work, since the author&#8217;s using some sort of byte-offset to read the options &#8212; instead of creating a much more organized method of using a separate table or multiple options, everythings been dumped into one big ole string of text &#8212; which is highly annoying.  So copy-and-pasting the chunk of it that&#8217;s missing from one site&#8217;s DB to the other&#8217;s didn&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>Uninstall/Reinstall?  No such luck there either.  First off, it didn&#8217;t delete the DB entry during the uninstall process.  Secondly, it didn&#8217;t start saving stuff after I&#8217;d reinstalled it (and it recreated that options entry in the DB).</p>
<p>So, I&#8217;m done.  I&#8217;ll keep it installed on here (MyHumbleAbode.com) since it&#8217;s working (oh, and it&#8217;s still saving changes here, tested that too).  But over on JonWarrenPhotography.com, I&#8217;ve uninstalled it and am looking for another option.</p>
<p>(ha ha time) Since it&#8217;s written by someone named Paul Menard, perhaps he&#8217;s been too busy racing in NASCAR to fix the plugin.  (No, I seriously doubt that it&#8217;s the same person.)</p>
<p>Update:  I found an alternative that works, so I&#8217;m ditching Simply Exclude (SE) from both sites and going with Advanced Category Excluder (ACE).  The only drawback to this change, that I can see at the present, is that ACE doesn&#8217;t support tag-based exclusion and SE does.  But since all my Twitter feed posts are stuck into a separate category, I don&#8217;t need that functionality (at this time).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.myhumbleabode.com/post/1783/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
